Conquer Club

MSNBC

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Do You Watch MSNBC

 
Total votes : 0

MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:32 pm

I have watched MSNBC All Day today. Even Chris Mathews twice (yeah I got off work early today). From what I can tell, the 112th Congress is already a failure before they even take their seats. I mean, every show, is just hit piece, after hit piece. I think they might have attacked every single republican in the house today. And some of the points they are hammering, this failure of a promise to cut 100 bill in the first year? #1 I have never hear that promise #2 The lame duck congress just passed last years budget a couple weeks ago which has effects for the next 6 months, giving only 6 months to control the budget. Even worse, these hosts start off with a premise that I vehemently disagree, and then they just draw it out that way, and pile worst case scenario onto worser case, and then tell you who to blame with some of the biggest jumps in logic I have witnessed to date, as well as call them hateful names and use foul language. I even saw Ed Schultz apologizing for something, I did not catch what just happened (I was writing a love letter to Baron or something) but I could tell I missed a doozy. Heck I'll find it oh wait nope nobody even bothers to put Schultz on youtube. Most recent 2 weeks ago? wow
Oh well anyways he apologized for getting WAY TOO ANGRY and calling the republicans a bad name. Okay now I understand the hard left is all in a tizzy today, but I just wanted to say, in public, I will watcheth MSNBC no more. They are living in a bubble over there, and it's a very dangerous one. Stoking hate and pumping fear. I even heard Al Sharpton say minorities had better be worried because the Tea Party is gonna "turn back the clock" 40 years on civil rights. wut? Sounds like a call to arms to me, accept, I have no fucking idea where the hell he gets the clock being turned any which way....It was a very different al sharpton, a very animated, stoking, keeping the flame hot....
Last edited by Phatscotty on Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:09 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Baron Von PWN on Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:26 pm

Phatscotty wrote: (I was writing a love letter to Baron or something) t?

:oops:
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: MSNBC

Postby The Bison King on Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 pm

Wow! I'm like really surprised you feel this way. No really, I totally would have thought MSNBC would be your bag.
Image

Hi, my name is the Bison King, and I am COMPLETELY aware of DaFont!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class The Bison King
 
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
Location: the Mid-Westeros

Re: MSNBC

Postby maasman on Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:04 pm

I read msnbc but don't watch it. I usually only read the science/tech stuff and world/national/health news, and try to stay away from the political commentary.
Phatscotty wrote:I have watched MSNBC All Day today. Even Chris Mathews twice (yeah I got off work early today). From what I can tell, the 112th Congress is already a failure before they even take their seats. I mean, every show, is just hit piece, after hit piece. I think they might have attacked every single republican in the house today. And some of the points they are hammering, this failure of a promise to cut 100 bill in the first year? #1 I have never hear that promise #2 The lame duck congress just passed last years budget a couple weeks ago which has effects for the next 6 months, giving only 6 months to control the budget. Even worse, these hosts start off with a premise that I vehemently disagree, and then they just draw it out that way, and pile worst case scenario onto worser case, and then tell you who to blame with some of the biggest jumps in logic I have witnessed to date, as well as call them hateful names and use foul language. I even saw Ed Schultz apologizing for something, I did not catch what just happened (I was writing a love letter to Baron or something) but I could tell I missed a doozy. Heck I'll find it oh wait nope nobody even bothers to put Schultz on youtube. Most recent 2 weeks ago? wow
Oh well anyways he apologized for getting WAY TOO ANGRY and calling the republicans a bad name. Okay now I understand the hard left is all in a tizzy today, but I just wanted to say, in public, I will watcheth MSNBC no more. They are living in a bubble over there, and it's a very dangerous one. Stoking hate and pumping fear. I even heard Al Sharpton say minorities had better be worried because the Tea Party is gonna "turn back the clock" 40 years on civil rights. wut? Sounds like a call to arms to me, accept, I have no fucking idea where the hell he gets the clock being turned any which way....It was a very different al sharpton, a very animated, stoking, keeping the flame hot....

So is MSNBC basically just a socialist Soros dominated propaganda outlet?

The problem I see is that the right does basically the same thing, and all I see is a huge shitfest because these grown men can't get along with each other. I am beginning to hate politics more and more because the right and left can't get along in an adult manner. They both spew their hate towards the other and come up with the worst possible scenarios for each other and just cannot reconcile their differences over issues very well.
Image
User avatar
Major maasman
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: Goose Creek, USA

Re: MSNBC

Postby Aradhus on Thu Jan 06, 2011 12:48 pm

The only host I consistently watch on MSNBC is Dylan Ratigan.
I dislike Chris Mathews, Keith Olbermann too consistently crosses the line from elitist to pompous demagogue. Rachel Maddow bores me, but I don't dislike her. Joe scarborough wouldn't annoy me like he does if Mika brezinski wasn't the "co-host".

I tend to spend more time watching conservative hosts, than liberal.
User avatar
Major Aradhus
 
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:14 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:56 pm

maasman wrote:I read msnbc but don't watch it. I usually only read the science/tech stuff and world/national/health news, and try to stay away from the political commentary.
Phatscotty wrote:I have watched MSNBC All Day today. Even Chris Mathews twice (yeah I got off work early today). From what I can tell, the 112th Congress is already a failure before they even take their seats. I mean, every show, is just hit piece, after hit piece. I think they might have attacked every single republican in the house today. And some of the points they are hammering, this failure of a promise to cut 100 bill in the first year? #1 I have never hear that promise #2 The lame duck congress just passed last years budget a couple weeks ago which has effects for the next 6 months, giving only 6 months to control the budget. Even worse, these hosts start off with a premise that I vehemently disagree, and then they just draw it out that way, and pile worst case scenario onto worser case, and then tell you who to blame with some of the biggest jumps in logic I have witnessed to date, as well as call them hateful names and use foul language. I even saw Ed Schultz apologizing for something, I did not catch what just happened (I was writing a love letter to Baron or something) but I could tell I missed a doozy. Heck I'll find it oh wait nope nobody even bothers to put Schultz on youtube. Most recent 2 weeks ago? wow
Oh well anyways he apologized for getting WAY TOO ANGRY and calling the republicans a bad name. Okay now I understand the hard left is all in a tizzy today, but I just wanted to say, in public, I will watcheth MSNBC no more. They are living in a bubble over there, and it's a very dangerous one. Stoking hate and pumping fear. I even heard Al Sharpton say minorities had better be worried because the Tea Party is gonna "turn back the clock" 40 years on civil rights. wut? Sounds like a call to arms to me, accept, I have no fucking idea where the hell he gets the clock being turned any which way....It was a very different al sharpton, a very animated, stoking, keeping the flame hot....

So is MSNBC basically just a socialist Soros dominated propaganda outlet?

The problem I see is that the right does basically the same thing, and all I see is a huge shitfest because these grown men can't get along with each other. I am beginning to hate politics more and more because the right and left can't get along in an adult manner. They both spew their hate towards the other and come up with the worst possible scenarios for each other and just cannot reconcile their differences over issues very well.


no no no way. I can't give you that. I will just go with your assumption of right media, which is Fox news. Sometimes, some of the hosts do the same things. You just hear about them....24-7. I'm watching Fox now...they are staying on issues.....next segment, more issues....no name calling, no saying democrats want you to die...LOL

I will just disagree with you thinking the same happens on the other side. You might even be able to cite a few examples, all I'm saying is the other side is doing it way worse, constantly. They don't even talk about the issues. They just say if you don't agree with the issue, you hate children.

I only point it out because of the potential danger.

Someone has to say something when Hitler comes around.


Fox News
Last edited by Phatscotty on Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby maasman on Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:36 pm

Ok, I'll give you the fact that I'm woefully unprepared to get into a full fledged debate about which side does it worse. All I can say is that I've heard worse things about Glen Beck's camp than anything on the left, but that could very well be the result of what I watch and who I talk to. I hate to take sides on things where I don't have all the facts, so I'll leave it at that.
Image
User avatar
Major maasman
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: Goose Creek, USA

Re: MSNBC

Postby thegreekdog on Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:38 pm

I really liked Olbermann. He was like the left-leaning, more intelligent version of Glenn Beck. Except instead of crying on cue, Olbermann would get angry on cue.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:42 pm

maasman wrote:Ok, I'll give you the fact that I'm woefully unprepared to get into a full fledged debate about which side does it worse. All I can say is that I've heard worse things about Glen Beck's camp than anything on the left, but that could very well be the result of what I watch and who I talk to. I hate to take sides on things where I don't have all the facts, so I'll leave it at that.


Yeah, I know. me neither. Although it may have looked that way, the main thing I want to talk about is the potential for violence and disorder.
Last edited by Phatscotty on Sat Jan 08, 2011 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby The Bison King on Thu Jan 06, 2011 10:53 pm

The problem I see is that the right does basically the same thing, and all I see is a huge shitfest because these grown men can't get along with each other. I am beginning to hate politics more and more because the right and left can't get along in an adult manner. They both spew their hate towards the other and come up with the worst possible scenarios for each other and just cannot reconcile their differences over issues very well.

The Bison King agrees with this statement.
Image

Hi, my name is the Bison King, and I am COMPLETELY aware of DaFont!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class The Bison King
 
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
Location: the Mid-Westeros

Re: MSNBC

Postby Army of GOD on Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:10 pm

If I ever catch myself watching MSNBC, I will cut my balls off right then and there. The only politics related show I watch is Colbert Report, but that's all satirical anyway.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Baron Von PWN on Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:39 am

I can't really stand watching american news of any stripe. Its all very abrasive, very politically charged and generally sensationalist.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: MSNBC

Postby GabonX on Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:16 pm

As much as I hate their politics, their website has had some great articles on science.
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: MSNBC

Postby GabonX on Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:17 pm

Baron Von PWN wrote:I can't really stand watching american news of any stripe. Its all very abrasive, very politically charged and generally sensationalist.

It's almost as bad as British news :lol:
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:07 pm

For the record, I am the "sometimes" vote
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Woodruff on Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:27 pm

Phatscotty wrote:I have watched MSNBC All Day today. Even Chris Mathews twice (yeah I got off work early today). From what I can tell, the 112th Congress is already a failure before they even take their seats. I mean, every show, is just hit piece, after hit piece. I think they might have attacked every single republican in the house today. And some of the points they are hammering, this failure of a promise to cut 100 bill in the first year? #1 I have never hear that promise #2 The lame duck congress just passed last years budget a couple weeks ago which has effects for the next 6 months, giving only 6 months to control the budget. Even worse, these hosts start off with a premise that I vehemently disagree, and then they just draw it out that way, and pile worst case scenario onto worser case, and then tell you who to blame with some of the biggest jumps in logic I have witnessed to date, as well as call them hateful names and use foul language. I even saw Ed Schultz apologizing for something, I did not catch what just happened (I was writing a love letter to Baron or something) but I could tell I missed a doozy. Heck I'll find it oh wait nope nobody even bothers to put Schultz on youtube. Most recent 2 weeks ago? wow
Oh well anyways he apologized for getting WAY TOO ANGRY and calling the republicans a bad name. Okay now I understand the hard left is all in a tizzy today, but I just wanted to say, in public, I will watcheth MSNBC no more. They are living in a bubble over there, and it's a very dangerous one. Stoking hate and pumping fear. I even heard Al Sharpton say minorities had better be worried because the Tea Party is gonna "turn back the clock" 40 years on civil rights. wut? Sounds like a call to arms to me, accept, I have no fucking idea where the hell he gets the clock being turned any which way....It was a very different al sharpton, a very animated, stoking, keeping the flame hot....
So is MSNBC basically just a socialist Soros dominated propaganda outlet?


Is this including the illegal Republican voting, or not including them?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:33 pm

read further on page 1, as I addressed it.

What do you think? Impeachment?
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jan 08, 2011 1:31 am

Phatscotty wrote:read further on page 1, as I addressed it.


I didn't see it, no...got a link?

Phatscotty wrote:What do you think? Impeachment?


No. But they may as well stop the charade of reading the fucking Constitution out loud, if they're not even going to bother following it.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:30 am

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:read further on page 1, as I addressed it.


I didn't see it, no...got a link?

Phatscotty wrote:What do you think? Impeachment?


No. But they may as well stop the charade of reading the fucking Constitution out loud, if they're not even going to bother following it.


Yeah dude, but you see, it was just 1 guy, maybe 2. I was not "the republicans in the house" I also wonder if maybe there was one democrat, or if this has happened before, or happens once a year? I mean what if their cab was in traffic? I don't know I guess they should have known maybe they shouldn't vote? They say they were elsewhere in the capitol. I guess it's only a big talking point now because, and I love this paragraph from Politico...

some outlets reported that he and Sessions were at a fundraiser. It is against federal criminal law for members of Congress to accept contributions in the Capitol or its surrounding office buildings, and there was no indication that he raised money at the reception.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:20 am

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:read further on page 1, as I addressed it.


I didn't see it, no...got a link?

Phatscotty wrote:What do you think? Impeachment?


No. But they may as well stop the charade of reading the fucking Constitution out loud, if they're not even going to bother following it.


Yeah dude, but you see, it was just 1 guy, maybe 2. I was not "the republicans in the house"


But really, it WASN'T...it was also the Republican leadership. If they're all fired up about following the Constitution, how can they not make sure that their folks are educated regarding the Constitution? It's not like they haven't had time since the election to make sure these two knew what the hell they were doing.

Phatscotty wrote:I also wonder if maybe there was one democrat, or if this has happened before, or happens once a year?


It may very well have, but I wouldn't find it nearly as relevant unless they were also running on this big Constitution issue. That's what galls me about it. It highlights to me that they're really not all that serious about it, and it's just a showpiece.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:29 am

I don't know. It looks bad, but I'm not about to start demanding perfection. I mean, the argument "well, they didn't do it in chronological order, so the whole idea of following the constitution is bullshit" doesn't flow for me

I think it amuses you because you are looking to be amused. It's ok, I catch the right doing it too. As always, you have to look through everyones bullshit, not just a certain peoples bullshit

seriously though, let's go through what it would entail for boehner (I assume) to make sure everyone is checked in like on the bus for a field trip? or maybe just hold up the entire ceremony for the 100's of people who were there on time? What should have happened?
Last edited by Phatscotty on Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:31 am

Phatscotty wrote:I don't know. It looks bad, but I'm not about to start demanding perfection. I mean, the argument "well, they didn't do it in chronological order, so the whole idea of following the constitution is bullshit" doesn't flow for me

I think it amuses you because you are looking to be amused. It's ok, I catch the right doing it too. As always, you have to look through everyones bullshit, not just a certain peoples bullshit


Are you suggesting I'm looking at this issue through some sort of a bias against the Republicans? You're so laughable. Unlike them, I actually do care about the Constitution.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:33 am

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:I don't know. It looks bad, but I'm not about to start demanding perfection. I mean, the argument "well, they didn't do it in chronological order, so the whole idea of following the constitution is bullshit" doesn't flow for me

I think it amuses you because you are looking to be amused. It's ok, I catch the right doing it too. As always, you have to look through everyones bullshit, not just a certain peoples bullshit


Are you suggesting I'm looking at this issue through some sort of a bias against the Republicans? You're so laughable. Unlike them, I actually do care about the Constitution.


ok, do you acknowledge they are trying? or even that there are many more other freshman much more serious about upholding the constitution than the 2 biggest jackasses?
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: MSNBC

Postby Woodruff on Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:53 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:I don't know. It looks bad, but I'm not about to start demanding perfection. I mean, the argument "well, they didn't do it in chronological order, so the whole idea of following the constitution is bullshit" doesn't flow for me

I think it amuses you because you are looking to be amused. It's ok, I catch the right doing it too. As always, you have to look through everyones bullshit, not just a certain peoples bullshit


Are you suggesting I'm looking at this issue through some sort of a bias against the Republicans? You're so laughable. Unlike them, I actually do care about the Constitution.


ok, do you acknowledge they are trying? or even that there are many more other freshman much more serious about upholding the constitution than the 2 biggest jackasses?


I'm not as upset with the two freshmen as I am with the Republican Congressional leadership on this issue, actually. THEY'RE just as much at fault as the two freshmen, and much more experienced.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: MSNBC

Postby Phatscotty on Sat Jan 08, 2011 6:01 pm

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:I don't know. It looks bad, but I'm not about to start demanding perfection. I mean, the argument "well, they didn't do it in chronological order, so the whole idea of following the constitution is bullshit" doesn't flow for me

I think it amuses you because you are looking to be amused. It's ok, I catch the right doing it too. As always, you have to look through everyones bullshit, not just a certain peoples bullshit


Are you suggesting I'm looking at this issue through some sort of a bias against the Republicans? You're so laughable. Unlike them, I actually do care about the Constitution.


ok, do you acknowledge they are trying? or even that there are many more other freshman much more serious about upholding the constitution than the 2 biggest jackasses?


I'm not as upset with the two freshmen as I am with the Republican Congressional leadership on this issue, actually. THEY'RE just as much at fault as the two freshmen, and much more experienced.


What did you expect the leadership to do?
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron