strike wolf wrote:
I don't think there's really a problem with being a little bit "on the fence" if it's true. I'm not always completely confident in my decisions and I don't have a problem showing that.
I am not completely confident either. I've said that I have had suspicions about you and chap. I have even said, if more experienced players think we have done enough damage to themselves to pursue another claim tonight then I would refrain from voting even though my gut tells me to put my vote on you. My reasons are:
1) As someone else said, there are too many people involved. This is a stupid metaphor but I think of it as a knotted shoe. Right now theres one big main knot that is messing everything up. If we can undo that one big knot, the rest of it should be easier.
2) I can make much more clearer cases based upon your alignment. If you flip scum I can do things like clear chapcrap. I know thats WIFOM, but you two have been butting heads SO much, I would be a little more confident following chap. Not saying that if you are town that chap is automatically scum either, as I have said multiple times I feel like it was an OMGUS debate for a leader of this game.
3) I think we have found scum. I think your posts have been too fluffy, I dislike how your biggest case was based upon that jokevote in another game, and I dislike how you dedicated that whole post to direct the town on what to do. And I do not know what type of relation you have to Betiko if any, but I am hoping that your claim may help to unfog.
Therefore, unvote vote Rodion