Darwin wrote:āThere is another and allied difficulty, which is much more serious. I allude to the manner in which species belonging to several of the main divisions of the animal kingdom suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks.ā (Darwin, The Origin of Species, p. 348),
āThe abrupt manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palaeontologistsāfor instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwickāas a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection.ā (Ibid., p. 344),
āTo the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer.ā (Ibid., p. 350),
āThe case at present must remain inexplicable, and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.ā (Ibid., p. 351),
Stephen Jay Gould wrote:āThe most famous such burst, the Cambrian explosion, marks the inception of modern multicellular life. Within just a few million years, nearly every major kind of animal anatomy appears in the fossil record for the first time ... The Precambrian record is now sufficiently good that the old rationale about undiscovered sequences of smoothly transitional forms will no longer wash.ā (Stephen Jay Gould, āAn Asteroid to Die For,ā Discover, October 1989, p. 65),
Richard Dawkins wrote:āAnd we find many of them [Cambrian fossils] already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history. Needless to say, this appearance of sudden planting has delighted creationists.ā (Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1987, p. 229),
I. Axelrod wrote:āOne of the major unsolved problems of geology and evolution is the occurrence of diversified, multicellular marine invertebrates in Lower Cambrian rocks on all the continents and their absence in rocks of greater age.ā (I. Axelrod, āEarly Cambrian Marine Fauna,ā Science, Vol. 128, 4 July 1958, p. 7),
Jeffrey S. Levinton wrote:āEvolutionary biologyās deepest paradox concerns this strange discontinuity. Why havenāt new animal body plans continued to crawl out of the evolutionary cauldron during the past hundreds of millions of years? Why are the ancient body plans so stable?ā (Jeffrey S. Levinton, āThe Big Bang of Animal Evolution,ā Scientific American, Vol. 267, November 1992, p. 84),
T. Neville George Professor of Geology at the University of Glasgow wrote:āGranted an evolutionary origin of the main groups of animals, and not an act of special creation, the absence of any record whatsoever of a single member of any of the phyla in the Pre-Cambrian rocks remains as inexplicable on orthodox grounds as it was to Darwin.ā (T. Neville George Professor of Geology at the University of Glasgow, āFossils in Evolutionary Perspective,ā Science Progress, Vol. 48, No. 189, January 1960, p. 5).
truth hurts, doesn't it?


















































































