Haggis_McMutton wrote:natty dread wrote:Night Strike wrote: You have no authority to claim that your morals are better than any other person's morals.
Bravo! Ten points to Night Strike! You're finally grasping some basic concepts of reality.![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't have any authority to claim that my morals are objective. And neither have you, or anyone else. Not even if you claim your morals are given to you by some bronze-age invention known as "GOD".
Therefore, what is considered moral is defined by consensus, in such a way that is beneficial to the collective. Everyone has the freedom to do whatever they want as long as their actions cause no harm to others, nor deprive others of their freedom to do what they want as long as their actions cause no harm to others... and so on and so on. Hey, it's recursive morality! Everyone wins!
But if we allow gay marriage god will kill a couple more hundred k people with hurricanes and tsunamis, therefore gay marriage is immoral.
CHECKMATE.
show the religion that says that... hint, it isn't Christianity...

























































































