Moderator: Community Team
natty dread wrote:Lootifer wrote:natty dread wrote:Seriously, f*ck mormons.
http://www.thetwentyfirstfloor.com/?p=4329
Religion is a disease.
Fxt.
No, I stand by my statement. Religious extremism wouldn't have a base to stand on without religion.
When it comes to religion, the only difference between "extremist" and "moderate" is that the extremist actually believes in their religion seriously, while the moderate just picks out all the inconvenient parts and sort of believes the rest.
Army of GOD wrote:oh god natty you're hilarious.
you fucking go on about bigoted people and shit like that and then you post "Seriously, f*ck Mormons" in the OP. The amount of hypocrisy is so amazing I am feeling physical pain.
Let's do some valid comparisons!!!!
Stalin was an atheist
Stalin killed many people because they weren't atheists
Therefore, all atheists are evil, rape children and drink the blood of newborn kittens.
Q.E.D.
natty dread wrote:
When it comes to religion, the only difference between "extremist" and "moderate" is that the extremist actually believes in their religion seriously, while the moderate just picks out all the inconvenient parts and sort of believes the rest.
Army of GOD wrote:anyway, natty's a troll PLAYER so there's no reason to respond to him
Army of GOD wrote:my biggest problem with the "militant atheists" is that they think religion is a one way street and that it's only a source of evil. But, when a religious person does good, it's because "they're a good person naturally" and not because of religion.
Maugena wrote:It has been reported by former members that the FLDS Church has excommunicated more than 400 teenage boys for offenses such as dating or listening to rock music
400 to-be men that won't be brainwashed anymore. Good for them.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
natty dread wrote: Arguably, religious people do bad things more often because of their beliefs than atheists do.
Army of GOD wrote: anyway, natty's a troll PLAYER so there's no reason to respond to him
natty dread wrote:Army of GOD wrote:anyway, natty's a troll PLAYER so there's no reason to respond to him
Now now, don't be greedy AoG... there's enough of my posts to go for everyone. No need to hog them all.Army of GOD wrote:my biggest problem with the "militant atheists" is that they think religion is a one way street and that it's only a source of evil. But, when a religious person does good, it's because "they're a good person naturally" and not because of religion.
I think you're confusing some concepts here. Of course individuals can do good things regardless of their beliefs. They can also do bad things regardless of their beliefs. However individuals can also do good or bad things because of their beliefs. Arguably, religious people do bad things more often because of their beliefs than atheists do.
Inb4 argument ad stalinum - stalin may have been atheist, but his lack of religion wasn't the reason behind his evil acts. His acts were not inspired nor motivated by atheism. Whereas, countless wars have been started because of religion.
Also, kittens.
natty dread wrote:Nah I just don't like people hurting kittens.
BigBallinStalin wrote:natty dread wrote:Army of GOD wrote:anyway, natty's a troll PLAYER so there's no reason to respond to him
Now now, don't be greedy AoG... there's enough of my posts to go for everyone. No need to hog them all.Army of GOD wrote:my biggest problem with the "militant atheists" is that they think religion is a one way street and that it's only a source of evil. But, when a religious person does good, it's because "they're a good person naturally" and not because of religion.
I think you're confusing some concepts here. Of course individuals can do good things regardless of their beliefs. They can also do bad things regardless of their beliefs. However individuals can also do good or bad things because of their beliefs. Arguably, religious people do bad things more often because of their beliefs than atheists do.
Inb4 argument ad stalinum - stalin may have been atheist, but his lack of religion wasn't the reason behind his evil acts. His acts were not inspired nor motivated by atheism. Whereas, countless wars have been started because of religion.
Also, kittens.
To be clear, are you saying that religion is the cause of countless wars?
Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:natty dread wrote:Army of GOD wrote:anyway, natty's a troll PLAYER so there's no reason to respond to him
Now now, don't be greedy AoG... there's enough of my posts to go for everyone. No need to hog them all.Army of GOD wrote:my biggest problem with the "militant atheists" is that they think religion is a one way street and that it's only a source of evil. But, when a religious person does good, it's because "they're a good person naturally" and not because of religion.
I think you're confusing some concepts here. Of course individuals can do good things regardless of their beliefs. They can also do bad things regardless of their beliefs. However individuals can also do good or bad things because of their beliefs. Arguably, religious people do bad things more often because of their beliefs than atheists do.
Inb4 argument ad stalinum - stalin may have been atheist, but his lack of religion wasn't the reason behind his evil acts. His acts were not inspired nor motivated by atheism. Whereas, countless wars have been started because of religion.
Also, kittens.
To be clear, are you saying that religion is the cause of countless wars?
How many wars have been started because of religion, if they are, indeed, countable?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
natty dread wrote:WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE KITTENS
Users browsing this forum: No registered users