Symmetry wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Symmetry wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Symmetry wrote:Meh, wasn't this simply the American right wing sabotaging American foreign policy again?
Yes.
The most rational and probable explanation for Egyptians not cheering, crying in happiness, and throwing rose petals at Clinton - as typically happens when American ministers speed through foreign capitals in their armored, 30-car motorcades escorted by helicopter gunships - was that there was a far-ranging conspiracy involving people opposed to Obamacare and FOX News to organize a protest of a routine junket of the Secretary of State to Cairo to create a few hours of minor embarrassment. It's unclear if the protesters were Tea Party members from Burley, Idaho pretending to be Egyptians, but that's - by far - the most logical conclusion.
One would assume that you're not buying into the them being pissed off about Monica Lewinsky? If you're going for anti-Americanism, I can see that, and would suggest that the widely reported accounts from the American right that the US is funding the Muslim Brotherhood might well be an important factor.
Of course, you could have a look at the article and see that said false reports were a major factor, or you could think that Egyptians are unusually bothered by a former president getting a blow job from an intern.
They said "Monica!" only to annoy Hilary because they're annoyed that the US is intervening in their joke of a democratic process--which is a joke due to the Egyptian military, which receives advice from the US.
And you're ignoring the Muslim Brotherhood stuff, why? I don't get this argument that it's not relevant, when I've provided a source saying that it was, with evidence.
hm?
Ohh... haha, I didn't know you posted an article... (whoops). It's interesting. Assuming it's true (e.g.
no pictures of placards at protest), then this was a great way for the military to exercise more control over Egypt. As with any protest (and there has been many in Egypt), the main political parties have the funding to encourage people to protest--i.e. pay to protest, or offer membership benefits.
I'd love to see Sara Ahmed's financial history. Unfortunately, I don't have a private detective license for the UK.
If she isn't being paid by some shell company operated by the Egyptian military, then it isn't clear why she's misrepresenting the facts about US involvement in Egypt toward the Muslim Brotherhood. Either way, the Egyptian military would definitely make use of her propaganda in order to legitimize their authoritarian policies. Perhaps, she's just an idiot about foreign policy--seeing that she cites a blog post by earlybird from lucianne.com, which alleged that the US gave $1.5bn Egypt after meetings with the Muslim Brotherhood. (The US gives this money to the Egyptian government, i.e. the military currently in power...).
Final criticism: that article is assuming too much about Egyptian sentiment. There's been many anti-military government protests before this one.
If you want to discuss the sources onto which Sara Ahmed latches, then we can talk about that too.