Alright Storr, I've looked at the posts from this day so far and a few of Hotshot's posts from day one and I kind of agree up to a point. His day one posts were fairly short, and they were few. Especially this post sticks out:
HotShot53 wrote:I would have preferred everyone switching to storr.... but since the choice is now between pershy and deg, deg's claim is fuller and more believeable, plus he has been more active and will probably be more help to town in the future, so I will unvote, vote pershy
Well... looks like I was FP and he has enough votes on him already, so I will unvote vote storr as the person who should have been lynched amongst the claimed people
Voting Pershy for good form but switching to you (Storr), also apparently for good form, as if the bandwagon on Pershy is tainted. He expresses support to the Pershy wagon and associates himself with it, but switches off when he notices that he can. I can't help but feel he jumped off because he knew Pershy was town. HotShot, why did you do this?
Then we have the day 2 posts. Out of the ten-ish pages we have, there are four posts containing a vote analysis of the end of day one, and two of those are actually by HotShot.
DdDd seems to have missed Sempais double vote which puts a dent in his Mudpuppy analysis, other than that it's a decent enough start but he seems to focus on Mudpuppy over everyone else.
DegastonThis analysis I like the least because Deg gives us two scenarios for each player and then connects a read to it with no particular motivation. His "strongly town"-read on Mudpuppy seems based on the fact that MP believed his claim. His other reads are not substantially supported at all.
Hotshot on the Pershy wagonHotshot on the Degaston wagonThese are decent analyses compared to the previous two, but as Storr said they are a point-by-point description of what the players did and then a read based on a hunch or feeling.
It should be noted that HotShot believes scum to be on the Degaston wagon, and
not on the Pershy wagon (by extension, this probably means he believes Dega to be town, despite his unconvincing ); that he votes for Dazza, who was on the Pershy wagon, even though he has two suspects on the Degaston wagon; and that he himself has associated himself with the Pershy wagon he proclaims as a Town wagon as discussed above.
The problem is that this is the only effort so far to get cases rolling. There have been some new cases and votes for them but few of them are warranted and none of them are convincing. Analysing the wagons is a very good starting point, even if HotShot doesn't bring his points home, not even close tbh.
I'll
vote HotShot just to get some pressure rolling because I want him to respond to this, specifically concerning the quoted post above, and I want other people to get involved in the game again. Activity is eye watering.
On a related note Storr, do you think that the mafia significantly supported the wagon on either Pershy or Dega?