degaston wrote:aage wrote:I can see that Storr would assume that this person wanted him to lead a lynch, granted that he assumed the message was intended expressly for him. In fact, if this message is legit, it speaks for him that he shares the message instead of following its orders, even if he may have misinterpreted them.
I've suspected that you were scum for a while, but your blind devotion to Storr and making apologies for his statements after two days of mis-lynches has me pretty convinced.
In any case, I don't want to lynch you today, or even Storr...
because
Ragian is the one who's been casting Cruciatus. I was hoping that an organic wagon could be started on him, so that I could see who would avoid voting for him, but the scum are working too hard to create distractions.
Well, that's fairly easy then. We'll lynch him by the end of the day. Day three just started though, we have all day to discuss and odds are about 99 to 1 that we will lynch Ragian by the end of it. Doesn't mean we should go right into night though, although I can see why you'd want to.
StorrZerg wrote:Btw I thought strike wolf sent it because it included "strike" twice.
This was my guess too after you posted it, fairly obvious imho. Degaston's analysis of your posts since 'the message' is so biased, it hurts to read.
Also, I'm turning around on this whole Streaker thing and have to
unvote because there is clear reason to assume this is a frame. Streaker's name is mentioned twice in the note. Someone already mentioned that it's odd that it's mentioned twice - in fact, it's odd that it's mentioned once.
First of all let's look at the nature of the message; it clearly states that "the boy" should be killed, pretty sure this is Harry Potter. This means the sender is anti-Harry and therefore likely mafia. I see no scenario where a town member would send this exact message to Storr since the message does not help the town at all and voices a strong anti-town tone.
Now for the mentioning of Streaker, there are several scenarios for Streaker to be anti-town, but each of them has problems.
- If Streaker is scum, why would he send a message addressed at himself to Storr (or anyone)?
- If Streaker is some outside-of-the-mafia man doing their killing, why does the mafia send a message that expressly states his name at all? They would know who they're trying to send it to, and Streaker knows that he would be the one receiving the message, by receiving it (duh) - why put it in there? The fact that it's mentioned twice only makes it more bloody obvious, actually.
dd515087 wrote:If Streaker is scum, I believe he is, they could've sent it to you to frame me knowing that Streaker would probably be forced to claim and then he would've set this up.
If Streaker is scum, deliberately sent Storr the message and eventually claimed, what exactly did he set up? The case against himself? Assuming you are not mafia, Streaker is mafia and this is a set up against you, it is not efficient to use this action as a devise to trap you. Either Streaker would be lynched and that would be the end of it, or you would be lynched and Streaker would be highly suspicious, and likely the next target.
Your suspicion of Streaker based on this message is odd especially.
dd wrote:StorrZerg wrote:Can we force dd5 claim before rage lynch?
If you really want to know who I am read all of my posts over again, how many times do I have to say this?

He's not asking for your name, he's asking for your night ability.
FP by a shitload of people
Storr, don't give up on the day yet, Deg's catch is nice but there's still a war to be fought here.