Moderator: Cartographers
nmhunate wrote:Speak English... It is the language that God wrote the bible in.
edbeard wrote:Overall the map is very busy. You have so many things going on it's all a bit much to take in. A bit too intense.
specifically I think the problem lies in the unplayable areas.
a. the water texture doesn't seem right. Yes it looks just like a picture of water (maybe this is the problem too much like a zoomed picture of a lake), but it just doesn't seem to fit in. This is especially true when you contrast it to the lakes and rivers.
b. the stone/marble whatever it is. I like it, but again too intense. The territories should be the focus on the map. Right now it seems like water, and stone with some land just thrown in.
Like people said, the bonus legend needs to be larger. I think red is worth 5.
snufkin wrote:I agree about the pictures on the sea - not so good.
You have very beatiful things going here, but the sea makes it look a little like a collage rather than a map.
The upper right relief of the unplayable lands look sharpened compared to the lower and left parts.. possible to make them more alike?
RobinJ wrote:Map is brilliant - keep up the good work.
But there are a few problems:
1) The sea doesn't seem to quite fit with the rest map
2) Bonuses legend is too small (but you did say you would fix that so that's alright)
3) I don't think you really need to have a legend telling us what the bridges, mountains, rivers and forests are - it's a waste of space. Either remove it or just group them under impassable
Night2 wrote:ok ...
Do anyone know how much is different of position that we enter for countries in XML and the real center position!?
AndyDufresne wrote:Would it perhaps be possible to differentiate between Bactria and the non-playable gameboard, a little more? Due to the fact you used the color not with an interior continent, it may blend a little too much with the background. Maybe you could play with the tone of it a little? Or switch gray to an interior continent? (really that just leaves Elam..hehe)
--Andy
AndyDufresne wrote::) Or perhaps a darker purple might do the trick.
--Andy
johloh wrote:did you just say the map is finished? because you dont really decide that...
johloh wrote:some ideas...
-bridges shouldnt be in the legend with 'impassable borders' as they are the opposite.
-i dont like the graphic in the space next to ashur, sidon, and jursalem.
-is it supposed to be spelled jursalem?
-i think you should remove the black shadows that border the rivers where they hit the sea...it should be straight blue to blue...
-should the river in sardis flow somewhere? its landlocked...maybe add a bridge and flow it into a body of water? you have a lot of other rivers that are landlocked too...is this accurate?
-id increase the font in the legend, you have plenty of room up there...
edbeard wrote:I'd remove the 'Completed' from the thread title. It's a bit presumptuous of you.
Like people said, the bonus legend needs increase in size. I'd say double if possible. Maybe move the top left over so you can move the bottom part upwards.
I'd also do something about your army circles. There's an thread called Army Circles, I think, with circles of perfect size. I noticed that the circles are different sizes on the small and large map. It's a bit lazy to just resize your map and have different circle sizes. I realize it's a pain, because I've done it myself a few times, but it looks much better.
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users