Also thor, vote with us, come on. I at least sort of defended you, that counts for something yes?
(Yes I'm shameless
Moderator: Community Team
Mayhaps his Ragooness is in need of a reminder. Care to help?Skoffin wrote: Is Ragoo ever going to address my reasoning for not voting Masket?

Fun fact: I've survived the previous two games I've played in (won one), so why would I change my play-style now when it's working so well?Thorthoth wrote: MM joined my bandwagon... what a douchebag. I suppose I should join his bandwagon in retaliation... but no, I will remain rational.
MM might be town. Doesn't he usually stay pretty quiet... Even if he is town, getting lynched would make a good lesson for him to change his play style...
Could MM and Pika both be scum again? An ironic possibility... but quite possible.

Okay, that does it. Vote MM.Minister Masket wrote:Fun fact: I've survived the previous two games I've played in (won one), so why would I change my play-style now when it's working so well?Thorthoth wrote: MM joined my bandwagon... what a douchebag. I suppose I should join his bandwagon in retaliation... but no, I will remain rational.
MM might be town. Doesn't he usually stay pretty quiet... Even if he is town, getting lynched would make a good lesson for him to change his play style...
Could MM and Pika both be scum again? An ironic possibility... but quite possible.
If you're going to theorise that Pika and I are scum, then you're going to have to analyse the lore discussion we had near the start. IE: would we openly debate like that knowing we were both scum? At first glance you might think so because it's a simple way of driving an imaginary wedge between us early on, so players don't suspect we're linked.
Ahh, but many of us here are experienced players, so now you have to bear in mind that reverse psychology is in play - we're banking on everyone else thinking exactly that so that we can get away with it.
The question then for you is do you think that reverse-reverse psychology is in play?
ZaBeast wrote: If fake claims are present, can someone briefly explain me how thor (or anyone, for that matter) claiming role X would make him more of a confirmed townie?
Thorthoth wrote:Okay, that does it. Vote MM.
Isn't your previous post the ironic one? Also, your vote isn't valid. Try figuring out why, you're a big boy.Thorthoth wrote: MM joined my bandwagon... what a douchebag. I suppose I should join his bandwagon in retaliation... but no, I will remain rational.
MM might be town. Doesn't he usually stay pretty quiet... Even if he is town, getting lynched would make a good lesson for him to change his play style...
Could MM and Pika both be scum again? An ironic possibility... but quite possible.
Skoffin wrote: It appears we are at an impasse as 4 people are voting masket, 4 are voting Thor and 4 are voting for no lynching. As we need 9 people for a verdict someone is going to have to change. you could all change to hotshot for example.![]()
If I had to change, I'd switch to Hotshot, mostly because of the scummarining. Even after he posted to explain why he wasn't active, I haven't seen him much. 4 posts from him on the 19th, and all a few lines at most (relevant to the topic: 6, 2 (not including both parts where he talks about his absence/future one), 2DirtyDishSoap wrote:In any event, I never understood the reasoning to vote for MM. Hotshot is a maybe, I'm just use to him being a lurker. Thor, imo, is the better candidate of the three. Even if he's a vanilla, it's better to just get it out of the way now, rather than later.
(which I find ironic), and 3. Also, as I explained previously (see the quote on the last HotShot post), I feel it is fishy the way he is considering switching to MM if he can't lynch me. His explanation makes sense, but he could still be a scum (and MM being town) trying to get more arguments for lynching me later on.HotShot53 wrote: Posting only flavor without scum hunting is considered scummy because scum can do it to post and seem to be active, but not actually contribute anything meaningful, or take positions on any players. So it's pretending to be active while actually scumarining.
I'm pretty sure the only change is MM voted for Thor. Unless I get fp'edBuJaber wrote:Official vote count asap please.
He didn't like the way I asked KJ if he was a double dwarfThorthoth wrote:Why is HotShot voting fro ZaBeast, I forget... Does it even matter?
What would the point in D1 be if scum don't know who each other are? Lynching someone that may be on your team or not makes no sense. There wouldn't be a way to get scum tells from anything.Thorthoth wrote:I think usually scum knows who each other are on Day 1, but that might not always be true...
You've been more of a scum tell beacon than a scum tell detective.Thorthoth wrote:Besides, if I do stay around I might serve as a useful town catalyst/ detective.
(Because that's all there is to this post)ZaBeast wrote:(which I find ironic)HotShot53 wrote: Posting only flavor without scum hunting is considered scummy because scum can do it to post and seem to be active, but not actually contribute anything meaningful, or take positions on any players. So it's pretending to be active while actually scumarining.
Lead by the exemple, then?DirtyDishSoap wrote: In any event, I never understood the reasoning to vote for MM. Hotshot is a maybe, I'm just use to him being a lurker. Thor, imo, is the better candidate of the three. Even if he's a vanilla, it's better to just get it out of the way now, rather than later.
Or ar fake claims roles left non-assigned on purpose, but the list of which isn't given out to scum? I assumed fake claims were a list of roles scum could claim without fearing being contradicted, but maybe they have to guess them. And then the usefulness of claiming makes more sense.ZaBeast wrote:If fake claims are present, can someone briefly explain me how thor (or anyone, for that matter) claiming role X would make him more of a confirmed townie?
Masket is playing in the same style D1 as other games where he has been town, therefore his posts so far are not an indication of scumminess.Ragian wrote:Mayhaps his Ragooness is in need of a reminder. Care to help?Skoffin wrote: Is Ragoo ever going to address my reasoning for not voting Masket?


There are a lot of (suspiciously?) quiet player,not just MM & Hotshot.Skoffin wrote:I'll ask you the same thing I ask Ragian; if Masket is playing D1 here the same way that he has played D1 in other games as town, on what basis do you determine his actions are scummy? Masket may not contribute much now but he always ends up contributing plenty in later days. On the other hand Hotshot has not contributed D1 and he is notorious for not contributing in general. So why Masket over Hotshot? I'm starting to get the sense that people are avoiding the hotshot possibility entirely and I'm starting to wonder why.
Probably because more people are voting for MM now, so if we want a lynch or even a claim before sunday there is more chance of that happening with MM than with me.Skoffin wrote: Your long rambling post at the top was just thoughts that pretty much everyone thinks through, but just don't waste time writing them down. In the end that speech didn't really conclude much.
I'll ask you the same thing I ask Ragian; if Masket is playing D1 here the same way that he has played D1 in other games as town, on what basis do you determine his actions are scummy? Masket may not contribute much now but he always ends up contributing plenty in later days. On the other hand Hotshot has not contributed D1 and he is notorious for not contributing in general. So why Masket over Hotshot? I'm starting to get the sense that people are avoiding the hotshot possibility entirely and I'm starting to wonder why.
In what way do I seem insincere exactly?Thorthoth wrote:A lot of players want to to put some pressure on players that they think might be scummy.
That might be why Mudpuppy is voting for me. He's wrong, but he seems sincere. Mitch less so, Pika and MM much less so.
Perhaps, although personally I wouldn't be opposed to a Hotshot53 lynch from what I've seen today, but with Thorthoth dragging their heels more and more of late I see no reason to even consider a change to my vote without them claiming at this point.Kamikaze Jawa wrote:So at this point, it seems there are three possible bandwagons? No-lynch, Thorth and Masket. I don't see it likely that enough people will change votes to anything other than one of these three.

Wow, just wow. I don't know if Bujaber is town or not, but we are way past the joke phase and dakky is pulling stuff like this??dakky21 wrote:I don't know if this was intentional or a joke, but as I always say voting people who are not in the game is the same as not voting or voting for the sake of voting.BuJaber wrote:Vote riskllama for making jokes at this very serious hour.
Vote BuJaber
That is dakky's day 1 procedure... he always votes for people who make joke votes for people not in the game, he considers it a very big scum tell. He's been right a few times, too... so it will be hard to convince him otherwise at this point.Thorthoth wrote:Okay we need to take a serious look at dakky's scuminess.
He just said he would vote MM to make him claim... but then at the same time, announces that he'll unvote him if the lynch actually gets close. Way to put on the pressure, ...NOT!
...and then he continues to malign BuJaber, because.... wait for it....
Wow, just wow. I don't know if Bujaber is town or not, but we are way past the joke phase and dakky is pulling stuff like this??dakky21 wrote:I don't know if this was intentional or a joke, but as I always say voting people who are not in the game is the same as not voting or voting for the sake of voting.BuJaber wrote:Vote riskllama for making jokes at this very serious hour.
Vote BuJaber

Already am.ZaBeast wrote:Lead by the exemple, then?DirtyDishSoap wrote: In any event, I never understood the reasoning to vote for MM. Hotshot is a maybe, I'm just use to him being a lurker. Thor, imo, is the better candidate of the three. Even if he's a vanilla, it's better to just get it out of the way now, rather than later.
Thorthoth wrote:Okay we need to take a serious look at dakky's scuminess.
He just said he would vote MM to make him claim... but then at the same time, announces that he'll unvote him if the lynch actually gets close. Way to put on the pressure, ...NOT!
...and then he continues to malign BuJaber, because.... wait for it....
Wow, just wow. I don't know if Bujaber is town or not, but we are way past the joke phase and dakky is pulling stuff like this??dakky21 wrote:I don't know if this was intentional or a joke, but as I always say voting people who are not in the game is the same as not voting or voting for the sake of voting.BuJaber wrote:Vote riskllama for making jokes at this very serious hour.
Vote BuJaber
The problem with Masket vs Hotshot is that Masket, imo, has proven to be the far deadlier player no matter which alignment. If he's scum, that's ALOT of breathing room on our end, if not, doc will just have to protect him in the mean time. Hotshot on the other hand, well, you pretty much just eliminated the reasoning as to why I wouldn't want to pursue him. The same thing has applied to the likes of DJfireside.Skoffin wrote: Your long rambling post at the top was just thoughts that pretty much everyone thinks through, but just don't waste time writing them down. In the end that speech didn't really conclude much.
I'll ask you the same thing I ask Ragian; if Masket is playing D1 here the same way that he has played D1 in other games as town, on what basis do you determine his actions are scummy? Masket may not contribute much now but he always ends up contributing plenty in later days. On the other hand Hotshot has not contributed D1 and he is notorious for not contributing in general. So why Masket over Hotshot? I'm starting to get the sense that people are avoiding the hotshot possibility entirely and I'm starting to wonder why.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Legolas and Tauriel (the female Silvan Elf) only feature in the film version, Legolas so they could cynically push the films onto those who have a passing interest in LOTR and Legolas fanboys, Tauriel (and Bard's kids for that matter) so they could make the film more "Hollywood" by dilluting the story with unnecessary love interests and "drama"*. That, along with the addition of Azog and greater presence of Radagast so the first film actually had anything at all happen during it, is how they turned a short book into three films, and why, especially by the third film, there were large parts that felt dragged out and dull.DirtyDishSoap wrote:(I'm going to assume one of the elves is present in this, the one that I think it was Kili that wanted to pork her).