And here I thought Thor was leaning town on me because I tried to divert the lynch of a jailor. A bit disapointed he needed the mod to lay it out for him now
Pikanchion wrote:Perhaps it would be wise to have everybody not on the confirmed list to either lore or full claim now?
What do you guys/gals think? I'd say a claim from at least HS and Sam would be nice to have tbh. And if it makes scum NK them, I won't be very sad.
tbh, my main reason for giving HS a pass is this.
ZaBeast wrote:Regarding the kill-less N1, I think there are 3 2 options
1- Scum targeted MM and the kill failed because he was jailed by Rag
2- An eventual doctor and scum chose the same target
3- Scum targeted the role left by IP, and LoVo conveniently decided he was commuting
What can we possibly deduce from these cases? (spoiler: not much)
1- Scum wanted to throw shade at the people voting MM, and the only scum in there was likely dakky (and it makes sense with his vengeful power that scum wouldn't mind that much throwing shade at him). As a reminder, the people that voted MM at the peak of the wagon (VC 1.6): Minister Masket (6): ZaBeast, Ragian, BuJaber, Thorthoth, Hotshot53, dakky21 (and Flores forgotten by the mod)
The fact BuJ and Ragian are dead and were town and that thor is a mod-confirmed townie makes this option pretty plausible IMO.
2,3- nothing at all
And I'd say we have a 50/50 chance of MM being the scum's target (provided there's no busser)
HS basically used the same argument as flores for voting BuJ btw (though Flores had voted BuJ earlier for other reasons). But these two votes look like people going at the easier bandwagon to build to me. Either lynch-eager townies or scum, not sure about that.
HotShot53 wrote:
Voting no lynch on day 3, plus asking for info that only helps scum makes me unvote, vote BuJaber
I still think MP is a bit scummy for not full claiming, but I was the only vote left there so that wasn't going anywhere.
FloresDelMal wrote:I am not comfortable with the case on KJ, i think he should mend his scummarining ways, but the same could be said about hotshot, MM and others, so i could like to actually see him participate more and build cases before i can make my mind about where to put him on the scale of greys
and because i believe puppy's flavour claim and BuJ made himself no favour by asking the jailor or roleblocker who his target will be and then voting no lynch in D3, I'll just go ahead and Vote BuJ once again
madmitch wrote:HotShot53 wrote:A jailkeeper claim isn't guaranteed to be town, as a scum rolebloker could masqueraded as a jailkeeper without stretching their role too far. However, based on Ragian's reaction with thinking he caught MM lying, I am leaning town on him for now. I'm not sure a scum roleblocker would have been that obvious he was a roleblocker on a gambit.
THIS is one reason I willing to not vote for H.S. at the moment, My sights are set on K.J. because Rags thought something was off but I am willing to go with towns decision
HotShot53 wrote:My opinion on Ragian's not full claiming is the same as on Mudpuppy not full claiming... it's usually a scum move to not full claim when at L-2, and half claims only make me more suspicious whatever the name claim is. I was also suspicious of Ragian for his soft defense of dakky on day 2. So if nothing changes I will hammer ragian before the deadline.
He posted this between the time I said he was a jailor and Rag claim. He didn't hammer though. I wonder if he was hoping a misguided townie would.
Also, other weak arguments for both sides from D3:
Samlen wrote:
ZaBeast wrote:Samlen wrote:His team, however, should've noticed fairly quickly the hole dakky was digging himself into and probably at least 2 of his scummates would've jumped on the chance to grab easy town cred.
btw, what makes you so sure there's 4 scums (or more)? Skoff said scums in LoVo's games usually all had a power role, so I wouldn't be surprised if there were only 3, all with powers, given how town doesn't seem to have that many either
Just basic assumption from numbers. Besides, even if each of the roles we've seen so far have all been low-mid range power, that's normal for a mafia game with a decent amount of vanilla townies, and we haven't had an indicator that there are a decent amount of said vanilla townies. If, say, half of the town had some sort of power within the range of mason to even-night commuting, then the mafia would probably need 4 memebers with powers to have a fighting chance. Besides, a 3-man mafia where one of their powers is to get lynched? The other two would have to be quite powerful to make up for the low numbers and dakky's power being activated upon being lynched.
Baseless speculation on HS being dakky's scum buddy due to him looking mad after thor was mod-confirmed town
ZaBeast wrote:Samlen wrote:ZaBeast wrote:
I was looking back at mitch's posts and I found
this:
madmitch wrote:Wow what a lucky night for us especially Thort, Dakky asking about actions does sound scummy but I think he might be on to something. Do we start all over with new suspects or should we be like Rags and stick to our D1 favorites and push them harder? I was suspicious of Thort until he was proven town and then Ifollowed Skoffin lead on Hot Shot but basically the vote was split and time ran out so there was not much pressure put on the suspects we had,right now I am thinking either MM or HS ,they seemed to be the popular ones at the moment
Am I wrong in thinking this post is particularly fishy?
- especially Thort --->why did he think thor was lucky to have gotten through the night? Did he have reason to believe he was supposed to be night killed? I mean, I wouldn't think thor was the most likely NK target, since he didn't seemed very helpful to town on D1, even as a confirmed townie.
- but I think [dakky] might be on to something-->pushing for a role claim as well.
With this in mind, I will
unvote vote mitch
That's actually the most convincing argument I've seen all day. At least better than the one to lynch dakky. I think i'll wait for a response from mitch but I doubt it'll change my mind.
Also, what's up with that? Saying it's the best argument you've seen all day, but not acting up on it. And mitch never explained the role fishing part either... hmmm you're next in line if mitch flips scum.