ZaBeast wrote:BuJ said he was redirected on N2 because the result he got couldn't come from mets. I just asked pika to confirm since he claimed to have received BuJ's result through wiretapping Aage
Moderator: Community Team
ZaBeast wrote:BuJ said he was redirected on N2 because the result he got couldn't come from mets. I just asked pika to confirm since he claimed to have received BuJ's result through wiretapping Aage
BuJaber wrote:I think the main reason I don't trust TX is the "You can't prove I'm scum" thing. He's very confident about that. Yet he claims to be a redirector. Now let's break that down a little bit.
Skoffin wrote: I.... don't follow?
ZaBeast wrote:Skoffin wrote: I.... don't follow?
I targeted tobi so he would be redirected. Therefore BuJ shouldn't have been redirected. However, BuJ claims he still did not land on his target based on the result he got (targeted mets, and said the result can't apply to mets) and Pika confirms (claimed to have wiretapped Aage, who wiretapped BuJ, effectively getting the result of BuJ's action). There is still the possibility that BuJ has been bussed, but then that would mean both chap (claimed busdriver, I don't believe we have 2) and TX (claimed not the have been redirected, even though tobi's action landed on him) have to be lying.
Clearer?
Skoffin wrote: Chap, you can see it your way but I'm not going to stop seeing it from my perspective. Your plan is terrible and puts us at risk of losing if we guess wrong. You are overrelying on your role to save the day and I am not going to use statistics alone to decide how to vote and everyones actual play etc needs to be considered.
Pikanchion wrote:chapcrap wrote:Skoffin, while you may view it as a 1/2 chance to lynch from group A, the majority of people cannot see it that way. At best, it's 1/3 if they think sw is town. I do think that. But between Ragian, you, and Tobi, I'm really unsure. I have a ranking for scumminess that I laid out earlier, but they truth is, I cannot be sure and neither can others. So, group B is better as far as ratios go. And, if you really believe BuJ is town, which I think you said before, then that makes the group B ratio even better for a scum lynch. And even better if a townie is accidentally lynched today. To me, with the information I have, a group B lynch makes the most sense.
Even if you are telling the truth it would be at worst 2 scum in each group from the information you claim to have, given you know one of the four from last night are scum and you cannot know if TX AG 90 is Town. Why are you so sure two players whose claims are nearly identical are both town, and further, if you are so sure about strike wolf then you actually have an additional group for which the likelihood is of lynching scum is 1/3; Ragian, Skoffin, and Tobikera.
Skoffin wrote:Hey chap if you believe Zabeast the most, how come you don't want to lynch Tobi?
ZaBeast wrote:There are different combinations of people lying that could be possible, but the most likely one (because it involves only 1 person lying) is you lying.
blacky365 wrote:ZaB are you willing to put your neck on the line for this lynch?
If tobi flips town and master redirector how will you respond?
I’m being won over by the tobi lynch argument, but I’m just not 100% convinced... something about tobi seems legit
chapcrap wrote:I suggested not lynching him because of his role claim.
chapcrap wrote:I never said he was a townie or shouldn't be lynched.
chapcrap wrote:Skoffin wrote:Hey chap if you believe Zabeast the most, how come you don't want to lynch Tobi?
First of all, I never said I believe ZaB the most. I believe sw the most. I feel like I have made that clear.
chapcrap wrote:Of those 5, I trust ZaB the most and Sirius/Pika/blacky the least.
chapcrap wrote:New ability - swap the actions of 4 people. This happens in two sets of two. So, basically double the first action. In addition to the doubling, I also get told how many scum are involved with the 4 people I switch.
If we all make it until tomorrow, I should have new information on the investigative properties of my role.
I will be able to bring more information tomorrow as well. Could be 4 completely new people. Could be the same people. That will depend on how I feel about the day once night is here.
chapcrap wrote:blacky365 wrote:ZaB are you willing to put your neck on the line for this lynch?
If tobi flips town and master redirector how will you respond?
I’m being won over by the tobi lynch argument, but I’m just not 100% convinced... something about tobi seems legit
Again, I don't accept the counter claim as a lynch reason. I think directing people towards that end is scummy. And if you were willing to try to hold ZaB to that now, why are you not voting for Skoffin for yesterday's lynch?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Pikanchion wrote:chapcrap wrote:Skoffin wrote:Hey chap if you believe Zabeast the most, how come you don't want to lynch Tobi?
First of all, I never said I believe ZaB the most. I believe sw the most. I feel like I have made that clear.chapcrap wrote:Of those 5, I trust ZaB the most and Sirius/Pika/blacky the least.
Pikanchion wrote:chapcrap wrote:New ability - swap the actions of 4 people. This happens in two sets of two. So, basically double the first action. In addition to the doubling, I also get told how many scum are involved with the 4 people I switch.
If we all make it until tomorrow, I should have new information on the investigative properties of my role.
I will be able to bring more information tomorrow as well. Could be 4 completely new people. Could be the same people. That will depend on how I feel about the day once night is here.
Do you stand by this highly believable claim?
blacky365 wrote:If you blindly lynch all of group b then we will lose, most likely because we will hit lylo before lynching enough scum...
I am only in group b because you have not investigated me, come check me out... I have nothing to hide and town has everything to lose by lynching another townie.
strike wolf wrote:Tx did try to sow some doubt about me day 3. It mostly revolved around the idea that I couldn't do anything about a poisoning the night one was poisoned. It mostly seemed based on a difference in how our roles worked.
chapcrap wrote:Skoffin wrote: Chap, you can see it your way but I'm not going to stop seeing it from my perspective. Your plan is terrible and puts us at risk of losing if we guess wrong. You are overrelying on your role to save the day and I am not going to use statistics alone to decide how to vote and everyones actual play etc needs to be considered.
It seems like you are intentionally trying to minimize what I'm saying. Two things do not have to be mutually exclusive. You can scumhunt within the group B. That's what I said from the beginning. Narrow the search.
Regardless, how great are we at scumhunting? We haven't found one yet. So, narrowing the parameters seems like a pretty freaking smart thing to do.
Yeah mate, and narrowing is what I am doing - ragoo/tobi is 1/2 chance in my eyes. Plan is still terrible for other reasons.Pikanchion wrote:chapcrap wrote:Skoffin, while you may view it as a 1/2 chance to lynch from group A, the majority of people cannot see it that way. At best, it's 1/3 if they think sw is town. I do think that. But between Ragian, you, and Tobi, I'm really unsure. I have a ranking for scumminess that I laid out earlier, but they truth is, I cannot be sure and neither can others. So, group B is better as far as ratios go. And, if you really believe BuJ is town, which I think you said before, then that makes the group B ratio even better for a scum lynch. And even better if a townie is accidentally lynched today. To me, with the information I have, a group B lynch makes the most sense.
Even if you are telling the truth it would be at worst 2 scum in each group from the information you claim to have, given you know one of the four from last night are scum and you cannot know if TX AG 90 is Town. Why are you so sure two players whose claims are nearly identical are both town, and further, if you are so sure about strike wolf then you actually have an additional group for which the likelihood is of lynching scum is 1/3; Ragian, Skoffin, and Tobikera.
Again, TX is part of the 5 in group B. I suggested not lynching him because of his role claim. I never said he was a townie or shouldn't be lynched.Skoffin wrote:Hey chap if you believe Zabeast the most, how come you don't want to lynch Tobi?
First of all, I never said I believe ZaB the most. I believe sw the most. I feel like I have made that clear.
Second, IF I believed ZaB the most, that doesn't mean I believe Tobi is scum. Tobi has a confirmed role. Confirmed alignment? No. We have already been burned by counter claims in this game. So, I'm done messing with counter claims as a reason to lynch.
Pika already sorted this one lolZaBeast wrote:There are different combinations of people lying that could be possible, but the most likely one (because it involves only 1 person lying) is you lying.
I don't accept this premise. The most likely is multiple. Unless you think there is only one scum...blacky365 wrote:ZaB are you willing to put your neck on the line for this lynch?
If tobi flips town and master redirector how will you respond?
I’m being won over by the tobi lynch argument, but I’m just not 100% convinced... something about tobi seems legit
Again, I don't accept the counter claim as a lynch reason. I think directing people towards that end is scummy. And if you were willing to try to hold ZaB to that now, why are you not voting for Skoffin for yesterday's lynch?
I'm definitely not voting Tobi with all of the scummy vibes I get from group B. That's an attention redirect from scum. Unless you believe that there are at least 4 scum between me, Ragian, sw, Tobi, and Skoffin, there are scum in group B. I don't think anyone thinks that. So, why not scum hunt group B? To me, that is a much scummier group than group A. Scummier in actions. Scummier from my night results.
strike wolf wrote:Skoff: Do you think Pika is town now?
chapcrap wrote:strike wolf wrote:Tx did try to sow some doubt about me day 3. It mostly revolved around the idea that I couldn't do anything about a poisoning the night one was poisoned. It mostly seemed based on a difference in how our roles worked.
This is the biggest reason that I leaned toward believing what TX threw down with his claim. He breadcrumbed and investigated sw's doc claim stuff for a while before claiming.
Razorvich wrote:High Score: 2569
TeeGee has my PW... Wall him if I get below 1 Hour in CLAN GAMES ONLY !!
Skoffin wrote:chapcrap wrote:Skoffin wrote: Chap, you can see it your way but I'm not going to stop seeing it from my perspective. Your plan is terrible and puts us at risk of losing if we guess wrong. You are overrelying on your role to save the day and I am not going to use statistics alone to decide how to vote and everyones actual play etc needs to be considered.
It seems like you are intentionally trying to minimize what I'm saying. Two things do not have to be mutually exclusive. You can scumhunt within the group B. That's what I said from the beginning. Narrow the search.
Regardless, how great are we at scumhunting? We haven't found one yet. So, narrowing the parameters seems like a pretty freaking smart thing to do.
Yeah mate, and narrowing is what I am doing - ragoo/tobi is 1/2 chance in my eyes. Plan is still terrible for other reasons.Pikanchion wrote:chapcrap wrote:Skoffin, while you may view it as a 1/2 chance to lynch from group A, the majority of people cannot see it that way. At best, it's 1/3 if they think sw is town. I do think that. But between Ragian, you, and Tobi, I'm really unsure. I have a ranking for scumminess that I laid out earlier, but they truth is, I cannot be sure and neither can others. So, group B is better as far as ratios go. And, if you really believe BuJ is town, which I think you said before, then that makes the group B ratio even better for a scum lynch. And even better if a townie is accidentally lynched today. To me, with the information I have, a group B lynch makes the most sense.
Even if you are telling the truth it would be at worst 2 scum in each group from the information you claim to have, given you know one of the four from last night are scum and you cannot know if TX AG 90 is Town. Why are you so sure two players whose claims are nearly identical are both town, and further, if you are so sure about strike wolf then you actually have an additional group for which the likelihood is of lynching scum is 1/3; Ragian, Skoffin, and Tobikera.
Again, TX is part of the 5 in group B. I suggested not lynching him because of his role claim. I never said he was a townie or shouldn't be lynched.Skoffin wrote:Hey chap if you believe Zabeast the most, how come you don't want to lynch Tobi?
First of all, I never said I believe ZaB the most. I believe sw the most. I feel like I have made that clear.
Second, IF I believed ZaB the most, that doesn't mean I believe Tobi is scum. Tobi has a confirmed role. Confirmed alignment? No. We have already been burned by counter claims in this game. So, I'm done messing with counter claims as a reason to lynch.
Pika already sorted this one lol
I was invited into and joined Group AZaBeast wrote:There are different combinations of people lying that could be possible, but the most likely one (because it involves only 1 person lying) is you lying.
I don't accept this premise. The most likely is multiple. Unless you think there is only one scum...blacky365 wrote:ZaB are you willing to put your neck on the line for this lynch?
If tobi flips town and master redirector how will you respond?
I’m being won over by the tobi lynch argument, but I’m just not 100% convinced... something about tobi seems legit
Again, I don't accept the counter claim as a lynch reason. I think directing people towards that end is scummy. And if you were willing to try to hold ZaB to that now, why are you not voting for Skoffin for yesterday's lynch?
I'm definitely not voting Tobi with all of the scummy vibes I get from group B. That's an attention redirect from scum. Unless you believe that there are at least 4 scum between me, Ragian, sw, Tobi, and Skoffin, there are scum in group B. I don't think anyone thinks that. So, why not scum hunt group B? To me, that is a much scummier group than group A. Scummier in actions. Scummier from my night results.
My overall answer to this is simply that I am not going to vote in a way that you direct me to. I don't know what side you are on and have no reason to trust your judgement over my own. I'm also not aware of your skill levels so, no offence meant, I can't be sure how likely you are to understand what is happening and how to read people and I'm not going to put my faith in you regardless of alignment. It's not the same as trusting people like Buj or strike whom we have reasons to view as town and have a known record of being good players.strike wolf wrote:Skoff: Do you think Pika is town now?
Not really sure yet.chapcrap wrote:strike wolf wrote:Tx did try to sow some doubt about me day 3. It mostly revolved around the idea that I couldn't do anything about a poisoning the night one was poisoned. It mostly seemed based on a difference in how our roles worked.
This is the biggest reason that I leaned toward believing what TX threw down with his claim. He breadcrumbed and investigated sw's doc claim stuff for a while before claiming.
I've been breadcrumbing all game, do you trust me too then eh?
Anyway we have like a day left ffs. In the interest of getting something done, I'll swap my vote and see what happens. Considering TX is in the B group Chap should have no problem with me voting him right? And chap should be willing to do the same, correct?
unvote vote TX
TX AG 90 wrote:Skoffin wrote:chapcrap wrote:Skoffin wrote: Chap, you can see it your way but I'm not going to stop seeing it from my perspective. Your plan is terrible and puts us at risk of losing if we guess wrong. You are overrelying on your role to save the day and I am not going to use statistics alone to decide how to vote and everyones actual play etc needs to be considered.
It seems like you are intentionally trying to minimize what I'm saying. Two things do not have to be mutually exclusive. You can scumhunt within the group B. That's what I said from the beginning. Narrow the search.
Regardless, how great are we at scumhunting? We haven't found one yet. So, narrowing the parameters seems like a pretty freaking smart thing to do.
Yeah mate, and narrowing is what I am doing - ragoo/tobi is 1/2 chance in my eyes. Plan is still terrible for other reasons.Pikanchion wrote:chapcrap wrote:Skoffin, while you may view it as a 1/2 chance to lynch from group A, the majority of people cannot see it that way. At best, it's 1/3 if they think sw is town. I do think that. But between Ragian, you, and Tobi, I'm really unsure. I have a ranking for scumminess that I laid out earlier, but they truth is, I cannot be sure and neither can others. So, group B is better as far as ratios go. And, if you really believe BuJ is town, which I think you said before, then that makes the group B ratio even better for a scum lynch. And even better if a townie is accidentally lynched today. To me, with the information I have, a group B lynch makes the most sense.
Even if you are telling the truth it would be at worst 2 scum in each group from the information you claim to have, given you know one of the four from last night are scum and you cannot know if TX AG 90 is Town. Why are you so sure two players whose claims are nearly identical are both town, and further, if you are so sure about strike wolf then you actually have an additional group for which the likelihood is of lynching scum is 1/3; Ragian, Skoffin, and Tobikera.
Again, TX is part of the 5 in group B. I suggested not lynching him because of his role claim. I never said he was a townie or shouldn't be lynched.Skoffin wrote:Hey chap if you believe Zabeast the most, how come you don't want to lynch Tobi?
First of all, I never said I believe ZaB the most. I believe sw the most. I feel like I have made that clear.
Second, IF I believed ZaB the most, that doesn't mean I believe Tobi is scum. Tobi has a confirmed role. Confirmed alignment? No. We have already been burned by counter claims in this game. So, I'm done messing with counter claims as a reason to lynch.
Pika already sorted this one lolZaBeast wrote:There are different combinations of people lying that could be possible, but the most likely one (because it involves only 1 person lying) is you lying.
I don't accept this premise. The most likely is multiple. Unless you think there is only one scum...blacky365 wrote:ZaB are you willing to put your neck on the line for this lynch?
If tobi flips town and master redirector how will you respond?
I’m being won over by the tobi lynch argument, but I’m just not 100% convinced... something about tobi seems legit
Again, I don't accept the counter claim as a lynch reason. I think directing people towards that end is scummy. And if you were willing to try to hold ZaB to that now, why are you not voting for Skoffin for yesterday's lynch?
I'm definitely not voting Tobi with all of the scummy vibes I get from group B. That's an attention redirect from scum. Unless you believe that there are at least 4 scum between me, Ragian, sw, Tobi, and Skoffin, there are scum in group B. I don't think anyone thinks that. So, why not scum hunt group B? To me, that is a much scummier group than group A. Scummier in actions. Scummier from my night results.
My overall answer to this is simply that I am not going to vote in a way that you direct me to. I don't know what side you are on and have no reason to trust your judgement over my own. I'm also not aware of your skill levels so, no offence meant, I can't be sure how likely you are to understand what is happening and how to read people and I'm not going to put my faith in you regardless of alignment. It's not the same as trusting people like Buj or strike whom we have reasons to view as town and have a known record of being good players.strike wolf wrote:Skoff: Do you think Pika is town now?
Not really sure yet.chapcrap wrote:strike wolf wrote:Tx did try to sow some doubt about me day 3. It mostly revolved around the idea that I couldn't do anything about a poisoning the night one was poisoned. It mostly seemed based on a difference in how our roles worked.
This is the biggest reason that I leaned toward believing what TX threw down with his claim. He breadcrumbed and investigated sw's doc claim stuff for a while before claiming.
I've been breadcrumbing all game, do you trust me too then eh?
Anyway we have like a day left ffs. In the interest of getting something done, I'll swap my vote and see what happens. Considering TX is in the B group Chap should have no problem with me voting him right? And chap should be willing to do the same, correct?
unvote vote TX
chapcrap wrote:OMG. Whatever Skoffin. Your responses are nothing. You obviously didn't even look at what I said. PIka is comparing things that don't even go together. And YOU didn't even respond to my response to YOUR question. And then you vote for a completely new person that no one else is thinking about voting for. What's the point? Try making a valid case maybe? You're dead to me in this game. Ignoring what you say for the rest of it.
Maybe I should have just kept my information to myself. Idk, but this is ridiculous.
blacky365 wrote:ZaB are you willing to put your neck on the line for this lynch?
If tobi flips town and master redirector how will you respond?
chapcrap wrote:ZaBeast wrote:There are different combinations of people lying that could be possible, but the most likely one (because it involves only 1 person lying) is you lying.
I don't accept this premise. The most likely is multiple. Unless you think there is only one scum...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users