Telvannia wrote:just like to point out.
north africa is south of south africa by your map.
same for northern europe and southern europe.
you could at least keep your direction constant.
oh yea! good catch.
Moderator: Cartographers
gimil wrote:here we go again klap
1. The terr boarder are MUCH better but still need a little work. However this isnt important at the moment.
2. The outer boarder of all continents are still very pixalated and must be smothed out.
3. Sea routes definetly need to be fixed
4. The continetns names are very messy and inconsistant they must be retyped.
5. The outglow oyu have used in everything (Continents and terr names) is to strong. May i suggested increaseing the spread a little and reduceing the opacity for the continents? and jsut reducing hte opcaity on hte terr names?
6. The backgronds nice but it doesnt fit with your continents i suggest you play around a little more.
7. I undrstand what your trying to do with keeping hte texture to a low but you really need a little texture to blend everything in. If you want to kep it sutle then try using the noise filter and then use pleenty of blu to make it discreat.
8. The new title doesnt fit with te rest of teh map
9. Increase the box size so that nothing is hanging out the bevel. and maybe reduce that bevel a little as well.
10. The blue color of the europe continet is 2 bright it needs to be dulled down a little to fit with the other colors
Thats all for now buddy
cairnswk wrote:Kaplowitz....forgive me if i missed something reading through this....but can you give us an explanation of the idea of this map i.e. what was your thinking when you first thgouht about this and why the continents are so mixed up...i am like some others who are failing to grab the point of the map.
mibi wrote:the borders are fine, no one should attempt to "smudge" or "blur" borders to make them less pixelated. The proper terminology would be to 'smooth' the borders, relatively easy to do in PS.
Gnome wrote:Ok, I'll give some things to work on...
1) The borders are still pixely...maybe you can try to Smudge them a bit
2) the background isn't a real improvement to me...it's to dark and doesn't looks like an ocean...
3)Your font colour are completely lost in your background...
4)play around with some new fonts...
5)A purple outer glow on a purple background reads difficult...
6)your compass...why did you add the 'outh' in plain white? It doesn't look good there... (wouldn't it be more logical if you put the arrow down and write 'N' under it...)
7) your Legend is to small, it's like the continents fall out...there is still room to make the square bigger...
8.) I don't think it's necessary to put a sea-way between the island and the land of Venezu(a)ela...the white Dot seems weird there...Maybe just find another solution to your sea-ways...
sorry for the list, you were bored so I thought I could give you some work
play with your map, try diffrent styles you'll get there
gimil wrote:Well South America is purlple and your terr names have a purple outerglow...
the terr names have a white glow?
bryguy wrote:Telvannia wrote:just like to point out.
north africa is south of south africa by your map.
same for northern europe and southern europe.
you could at least keep your direction constant.
yea dude he's right
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:bryguy wrote:Telvannia wrote:just like to point out.
north africa is south of south africa by your map.
same for northern europe and southern europe.
you could at least keep your direction constant.
yea dude he's right
I personally dont think they need to changed. But if its going to casue confusion maybe you can change the title so people understand a little better whats happening.
Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas
Users browsing this forum: No registered users