Eh?! Whatchu say to me, peon?!Ragian wrote:I wasn't fishing a claim, you poolickerYou are a die hard D1 no lyncher. Show me the magic.
I have no magic to show. No information to give. Leave me alone, I'm working with what I have.
Moderator: Community Team
Eh?! Whatchu say to me, peon?!Ragian wrote:I wasn't fishing a claim, you poolickerYou are a die hard D1 no lyncher. Show me the magic.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Kamikaze Jawa wrote: Eh as I said, practically every post I've made has been accused of being scummy (or for being too quiet) so I'm just going to try and be active and contribute regardless of how I sound.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:Eh?! Whatchu say to me, peon?!Ragian wrote:I wasn't fishing a claim, you poolickerYou are a die hard D1 no lyncher. Show me the magic.
I have no magic to show. No information to give. Leave me alone, I'm working with what I have.


I disagree, to use your examples:DirtyDishSoap wrote:Sure, constructed criticism is fine, but the argument is faulty. You have Flores and Hotshot who's participation is at best, low. You have Thor being Thor and Mitch being Mitch. The issue you're having is that you don't know the player and can't have an opinion about him because he's new, whereas, by now, you're use to the latter.
If I die (especially if I am the first to do so) please refer back to the latter part of this post and think about the information my death hopefully reveals in relation. Otherwise I have a second binary yes/no question I would like to ask and perhaps would have felt more comfortable doing so should the previously alluded to event not occured during day 1, but should others die before me I will hopefully get my answer and be able to fully explain myself.Kamikaze Jawa wrote:Speaking of, are we ever going to find out your mysterious information from Day 1? Or is that still 'too sensitive'?
But when I was barely posting in Lion King Mafia I was scum, ergo my posting a lot here means I cannot possibly be scum, amirite?[color=#FF0000][b]The Meta Queen[/b][/color] wrote:Calm down Piku; you were a newb not long ago ;) In fact, barely posting was your mantra not that long ago; what happened? Why the change? Why are you So vocal and aggressive now? ARE YOU SCUM?!
Thorin's Company has yet to even leave The Shire though... Perhaps if The Ring had an automatic first night action of targetting Gollum but...MudPuppy wrote:Wondering if lack of a night kill may be an indication of cult presence? Did the owner of the One Ring (not that the ring can truly be owned) successfully convert an unsuspecting Townie over to the dark side (yeah, I know it's the wrong movie... but you get what I'm saying)?
(and it's not exactly like Gollum became all buddy-buddy with others who gained possession of the ring either)Pikanchion wrote:Perhaps if The Ring had an automatic first night action of targetting Gollum but...
Apologies, I wasn't fully aware and responded to BuJ's post seeming to insinuate that I was somehow solely responsible for the no lynch occurrence.MudPuppy wrote:No talking during the night Thor, BuJaber, KJ, Ragian, & ZaBeast. That's a full third of the present party breaking the rules.
Oh I'm not saying that I can't form an opinion without metagaming, I'm just pointing out that most of the suspicions thus far have been reliant on metagaming. Therefore I have been at somewhat of a disadvantage compared to you dear folk.Pikanchion wrote:Meta observations have their place, but to say it's necessary to rely on them or that you cannot make posts without doing so is just not the case.
Pikanchion wrote:I disagree, to use your examples:DirtyDishSoap wrote:Sure, constructed criticism is fine, but the argument is faulty. You have Flores and Hotshot who's participation is at best, low. You have Thor being Thor and Mitch being Mitch. The issue you're having is that you don't know the player and can't have an opinion about him because he's new, whereas, by now, you're use to the latter.
-FloresDelMal has posted infrequently but always tries to post in-depth when returning and gives reasoned arguments, most of which I've agreed with this game, sure activity could be higher but this is at least broadly acceptable, so I don't really see how me not pressing her was influenced by meta
-Hotshot53 on the other hand is posting just as infrequently but rarely returns to say more than a line or two, and so I voted for them, if dakky21 hadn't jump-started todays discussion with role-fishing bait I might still be pressuring them right now, but until they post again (depending on what they say) or we have a deadline for the day there's no rush
-Thorthoth being Thorthoth is hardly a meta-analysis I could make if I wanted to after just one game together, and with them playing at least somewhat differently to the previous game where they were scum surely I would not have pressured them if I were to go off of the meta?
-madmitch being madmitch I would actually consider quite unfair to madmitch, he has been making far more reasoned posts than some previous games we've played together and certainly seems less prone to jump from bandwagon to bandwagon, and the only meta I really know of madmitch is the always-soft-claims-day-one-unless-scum thing that has been pointed out so often now I doubt it's still true
Meta observations have their place, but to say it's necessary to rely on them or that you cannot make posts without doing so is just not the case.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
We have a nazi mod when it comes to vote counts, so why not?Pikanchion wrote:Anyway, a game with a cult that has no real implicit or explicit cult aspects made apparent before the fact is generally considered a Bastard Mod game, which is generally bad practice and so I highly doubt it.
ebwopZaBeast wrote:And about the no-kill, scum whochose to send the kill from what I heard, so it couldn't be from the fact there still is one player missing right? Not to say he can't be scum, mind you. I'd expect the night to have lasted longer if the scum kill was missing.
QFT i do agree that there is no justification for players breaing such a simple and long standing rule as "no talking during the night" shame on you guys, and i also find a strange but in a good way how quickly the night went by, i for once was gladly surprised to see how fast D2 arrived, so kudos to everyone who sent their night actions promptly, way to go ^^MudPuppy wrote:No talking during the night Thor, BuJaber, KJ, Ragian, & ZaBeast. That's a full third of the present party breaking the rules.
Not really looking for an answer as to why (I assume everyone got their night actions in and LV wasn't waiting for anyone in that regard) but it seems odd D2 would start after only 27 hours (vs. "Night 1 will last 72 hours") when IcePack's replacement has not yet been found. We've already got 5 votes cast and not everyone has joined the party.
Wondering if lack of a night kill may be an indication of cult presence? Did the owner of the One Ring (not that the ring can truly be owned) successfully convert an unsuspecting Townie over to the dark side (yeah, I know it's the wrong movie... but you get what I'm saying)?
Anyway, none of this "it's another D1" nonsense... it's D2 and we need to string someone up.
QFT i agree with your analysis, hotshot still ranks high on my scum list, and thor was only absolved because of the mod intervention, about mitch i do agree he has shown a lot of progress in his gameplay, last time i played with him i face palmed my self so hard that i think my nose got flatter, i welcome and encourage this change on the right direction, i do beliave there is still room for progress, but as of now i am super happy and grateful for such change ^^Pikanchion wrote: -FloresDelMal has posted infrequently but always tries to post in-depth when returning and gives reasoned arguments, most of which I've agreed with this game, sure activity could be higher but this is at least broadly acceptable, so I don't really see how me not pressing her was influenced by meta
-Hotshot53 on the other hand is posting just as infrequently but rarely returns to say more than a line or two, and so I voted for them, if dakky21 hadn't jump-started todays discussion with role-fishing bait I might still be pressuring them right now, but until they post again (depending on what they say) or we have a deadline for the day there's no rush
-Thorthoth being Thorthoth is hardly a meta-analysis I could make if I wanted to after just one game together, and with them playing at least somewhat differently to the previous game where they were scum surely I would not have pressured them if I were to go off of the meta?
-madmitch being madmitch I would actually consider quite unfair to madmitch, he has been making far more reasoned posts than some previous games we've played together and certainly seems less prone to jump from bandwagon to bandwagon, and the only meta I really know of madmitch is the always-soft-claims-day-one-unless-scum thing that has been pointed out so often now I doubt it's still true
Meta observations have their place, but to say it's necessary to rely on them or that you cannot make posts without doing so is just not the case.
---
If I die (especially if I am the first to do so) please refer back to the latter part of this post and think about the information my death hopefully reveals in relation. Otherwise I have a second binary yes/no question I would like to ask and perhaps would have felt more comfortable doing so should the previously alluded to event not occured during day 1, but should others die before me I will hopefully get my answer and be able to fully explain myself.Kamikaze Jawa wrote:Speaking of, are we ever going to find out your mysterious information from Day 1? Or is that still 'too sensitive'?
DirtyDishSoap wrote: -Flores & Hotshot: Now you haven't voted for either, but let me be clear here, both would fall under the lurking/scummaring. Flores has substance, but does it excuse one over the other? Either both of them are okay, or both of them aren't, can't just excuse one over the other because one weighs in with a more validated opinion. Kind of the whole point of lurking to begin with. Appear to look active and not arouse suspicion.Those 4 mentioned have their metas.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
nah still love you too heh, but seriously, if anyone feeling annoyed by my posting pattern have a decent phone sleeping in a desk drawer because he or she just got the latest iphone or what not i dont mind handme downs, my phone is shit, my comp is falling apart and i am a latin girl with a big family, handme downs are pretty much a tradition for us, i am pretty sure my youngest niece still wore my Alf t-shirt, the same my cousins and siblings wore before her, and i am pretty sure 1 third of my wardrove comes from my nona and auntsDirtyDishSoap wrote:Fair point. I don't do much at work, and I don't check this at home. So I practically have 8 hours to sit and stare at my screen and melt my brain away. Sorry, still luvs you though. <3

skoff you are so shady, first you said i was unlikely to appear before the deadline, when it was you who told Ga7 to inform me of my prod, and then this when i actually went with your BW? tsk tsk, gurl, you are shadier than a palm tree:Skoffin wrote: Flores, you give actual reasons for suspecting other players of being scum yet you still default back to MM due to 'he was quiet D1' which people only went with because they had nothing else to go on.
How is that case better then the others? How is that more worthwhile than dakky or hotshot? Are you just diverting attention away from them while still looking like you suspect them? I still find it quite weird the manner in which people have avoided targeting hotshot; both masket and hotshot were initially suspected for similar reasons and yet masket is some 'solid case' while hotshot is not, people were all desperate to vote to ensure a lynch on masket but suddenly no one is keen on voting when hotshot is prime target (Buj even changed his vote entirely to someone with no votes less than a day before deadline), hotshot AND dakky has been found suspicious by a few but been excused with "that is how they roll" yet that is not applicable to anyone else. I get the distinct impression that scum are diverting lynches from certain people while trying to push towards some of the more skilled players here.
care to explain why are you so reactive to any questioning thrown at MM, is he your godfather?FloresDelMal wrote:Honestly i am still suspiscious of MM and since i havent played in literally years i can only use lion king as my reference, but if you are defending him that hard it could be interesting if someone could investigate you or see how this plays later on, and i dont remember at all hotshot playing style, if you say that he is often unhelpful i will take your word for it, and i will consider MM seriously for day 2 candidacy if nothing better comes along, but right now i don't want to split the votes and risk learning nothing, so ill go ahead and Unvote Vote Hotshot and cross my fingers that we will get it right.Skoffin wrote: Your long rambling post at the top was just thoughts that pretty much everyone thinks through, but just don't waste time writing them down. In the end that speech didn't really conclude much.
I'll ask you the same thing I ask Ragian; if Masket is playing D1 here the same way that he has played D1 in other games as town, on what basis do you determine his actions are scummy? Masket may not contribute much now but he always ends up contributing plenty in later days. On the other hand Hotshot has not contributed D1 and he is notorious for not contributing in general. So why Masket over Hotshot? I'm starting to get the sense that people are avoiding the hotshot possibility entirely and I'm starting to wonder why.
even though i am not sold on your towniness, i did make the same point on skoff and that's why i said it could be interesting to keep this in mind, and i could like to get an investigation on her (of course if she happens to be town there is no need to out yourself as the investigator, in fact even if she is scum, there is no much need either if you can just build a solid case, it's never a good idea to out oneself if not absolutely necessary)Minister Masket wrote:No it's because it was a baseless bandwagon to begin with. Frankly I'm surprised it got to 6. Then again I've come back from an 8 vote one before (a more deserved one that time) so it wasn't like I was even close to claiming.Ragian wrote: People are leaving the MM train. Is it because MM has gone completely silent? Is it because his lack of contribution? It reeks if nothing else. Skoffin's violent defence is noted too.
Skoffin hasn't been the only one defending me but she's definitely been the most....vitriolic about it? I'm almost tempted to say it resembles a 'non-town buddying up to a town player early on' tactic, but considering the weak arguments against me, could just as easily be a sensible town player too.
2 or 3 other suspicious players I'm tempted to turn my vote to, but need to re-read.
BuJaber wrote: If we start early this game day phase maybe we can force a few claims so since HS is probably the easier bandwagon to build... Vote Hotshot.
You're right that I'm overly defensive, and probably don't need to be however we've already had one player outright leave because he felt he was being pursued too harshly, and Thor used whatever power he had to get the mod to confirm he's town because he too thought he was being targetted too harshly (not saying he's right, just that he obviously felt the need). So it's not unreasonable for me to feel a little uncomfortable.BuJaber wrote:DDS : It's good that you and Pika are taking opposite sides on KJ because you kinda cancel each other out and then we can get a more neutral perspective. One thing you are wrong about though is that KJ IS showing a meta. It is not a complex one nor a particularly established one as it's only been a few days since he's played with us but he's 1) overly defensive (for example I wasn't blaming you for no lynch, you just happened to be the last vote counted. I would have named someone else if they voted last and made it 4 -4 by my count). 2) he keeps saying he's new and/or he doesn't know us in almost every post. If that is not a personality trait, what is? We all know it by now and the sensible among us will already keep that in mind. Move on to actual analysis. Stick with your opinion and make yourself heard don't get distracted by what people say about you - that is what the game is about. We argue all the time on here and yet most have made strong friendships over these mafia games. It's not personal.
MItch:madmitch wrote:@ BuJaber, you are right I am very cautious in this game, I am trying to change my play style and it is hard to break bad habits, I am still wary of THORTH maybe he is 3rd party ? just something off there, FOS against Dakky and Rags for asking about who did what? but why was Dakky voted for and not Rags ? they are both guilty, I can relate to what Flores (that little ray of sunshine...Not) said because I take a while to read and post,I am a little older than most or all of you,I remember having a phone on the wall with a crank ,our number was 1 long crank and 3 short ones,no shit guys ,anyway I am torn between H.S. and MM from D1 ,not quite sure who to vote for yet and I will wait for a while
Nobody kill Pika! we need to hear his incredibly important and insightful next question!! ....Oh pleasePikanchion wrote:If I die (especially if I am the first to do so) please refer back to the latter part of this post and think about the information my death hopefully reveals in relation. Otherwise I have a second binary yes/no question I would like to ask and perhaps would have felt more comfortable doing so should the previously alluded to event not occured during day 1, but should others die before me I will hopefully get my answer and be able to fully explain myself.Kamikaze Jawa wrote:Speaking of, are we ever going to find out your mysterious information from Day 1? Or is that still 'too sensitive'?
If I were trying to pressure you (in a scumhunting sense, rather than a please-make-better-posts kind of way) I would have voted for you, as I alluded to previously the first post in which I even mention Thorthoth and the—technically—fourth in which I mention IcePack (but really none of these are even directed at IcePack) I voted for them. If I were to post a player list ranked by how likely I thought them scum then you would only be around the top of the bottom half right now...Kamikaze Jawa wrote:You're right that I'm overly defensive, and probably don't need to be however we've already had one player outright leave because he felt he was being pursued too harshly, and Thor used whatever power he had to get the mod to confirm he's town because he too thought he was being targetted too harshly (not saying he's right, just that he obviously felt the need). So it's not unreasonable for me to feel a little uncomfortable.
As I wrote in an earlier post, I'm trying to be more active and constructive. I'm expecting Pika or ZaBeast to try and have me lynched in a day or two so I'm in a kind of 'f*ck it, I'll just do what I want and let the chips fall where they may' mood.
Sure let's do this, of course I can't drop the hammer if I'm also the first person on the bandwagon ;)Thorthoth wrote:dakky and Pika have both been caught fishing.... and Pika's vote on dakky could be an attempt to hide their scent. In fact that wouldn't even be an unusual tactic, more like 'scum basics 101'.
Solution: let's push dakky to the hammer.
1. If pika is town,
he'll either,
A. want to hammer dakky,
or else,
B. find a clear and communicable reason for us to unvote dakky.
2. If pika is scum,
he'll either,
A. suspiciously drop out of the lynch vote near the end,
or else,
B stay in and town will be able to make scum lynch scum.
Finally somebody standing up to say what we've all been thinking :DThorthoth wrote:Nobody kill Pika!