King 2.0 please.annieh wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 11:50 pm Cod, if Devante I did papertrail on you would it be a yes or no?
And what do you mean yes or no?
Moderator: Community Team
King 2.0 please.annieh wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 11:50 pm Cod, if Devante I did papertrail on you would it be a yes or no?

annieh wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 11:50 pm ...
Hjelp, you say you fill in for someone if you are there for their death. Why visit strike wolf night 2? Charle and sonic both seem like better options right there for you.
...
And Charle claimed after the Letter only Vanilla. So I didn't find any reason to visit Charle again.hjelp wrote: Fri Apr 10, 2026 3:28 pmI visited Charle N1 and strike wolf N2. The visiting is the key to activate the PR.Djfireside wrote: Thu Apr 09, 2026 5:50 pm I dont have anything special to clear myself yet, I wish I did so Ill try what I can cause Im curious as to what Hjelp noted as their role as it being a backup role needing activation, I have an idea what that could be and i'm willing to push that and see what happens.
...
As you could have read yesterday Ragian wanted 24 hours extra time to think about his:annieh wrote: Wed Apr 15, 2026 8:22 am
Sonic- You were mistaken though. Things have been said publicly and I didn't add details for him. You can expect me to be a little defensive of Rags because, throughout the game, I have been in high agreement with his posts. Maybe we'll learn some things later on that change my mind. At this point, if he can fool me that well, then I'm a fool for Ragian and we need to live with that.
This kind of "possibly embarrassing matters" are very exceptional moments when it comes to Ragian - he is brilliant at this game and it's probably the only moment we gonna get all game long. That is why i wanted maximum difficulty on this for him. That is also why i wanted him to answer all those 3 questions and asked you to keep silent until he answered first. If he is scum we want him to slip up; hence the extra third question (as a trap).Ragian wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 6:24 am That's actually a good point. Annoyingly. I hadn't thought about that, I think. I'm hoping it has to do with the chronology of information and me tunnelling rather than incompetence. I'll get back to you tomorrow when I have time for such possibly embarrassing matters. I will say, however, that as town I don't have to "wiggle", and should I be wrong, inconsistent, or a third awkward possibility, it wouldn't be my first time, and it sure as shite won't be my last time.
---
Only briefly about the doc claim: Annie has a protective element in her role, I have a protective element in my role, and I just don't see a doc in this setup (see who's messing with flavour now after all) when you also have your role. Too much protection in my opinion.


(I would like Annieh to remain silent on this for now and let Ragian answer this first).

Yes funny you did read that and not the next line in that same post "(I would like Annieh to remain silent on this for now and let Ragian answer this first)."annieh wrote: Wed Apr 15, 2026 9:37 am
You said I didn't mention anything publicly about my role and I did. I'm gonna stop there lest I distract too much from (what I see as your fundamentally flawed) line of questioning or say too much.
Nothing left to see anymore, you already answered for Ragian...annieh wrote: Wed Apr 15, 2026 9:37 am I'm completely thrown off of where you are coming from and will try to watch it play out without my input. Have at it!

1) Because - as mentioned - Strike's play and posts (even if they are too few) don't raise the alarm bells that Kong's do. As mentioned in the post I wrote before heading out, I hadn't thought about the possibility of Strike being a blocker. There's no factual evidence disproving Strike as a mafia roleblocker. Neither is there of Kong, me, Annie, hjelp, King Cod, or DJF as far as I'm aware.SoN!c wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 7:29 am
So Ragian:
1) Why hadn't you thought about Strike also visiting me on N2 (as a potential mafia roleblocker) when you used that exact same logic to frame Kong?
2) Explain your hybrid PR in detail (tracker/watcher + protective element combined).
3) Specify exactly what Annieh's "protective element" is — since you're basing your "too much protection, no Doc" argument (and thus Kong = mafia) on it. You must know the details if you're using it this hard, right?




Ragian wrote: Wed Apr 15, 2026 10:40 am 2) As mentioned, I will do so if the cleared town roles want me to. That is not just you, Son!c. However, with Charle largely AWOL, I will do so if Traf deems it necessary that I reveal my N2 action (which I've already stated yielded nothing) as well as my role (though one of our clever players has already outed me, but you've probably missed that). Apparently my suggestion of a mass claim early D3 wasn't such a bad idea after all![]()



This does not adress all those points. Its evasive and just designed to create doubt. Ofcourse this game is not about me. But hiding behind awol town is very convenient isn't it?Ragian wrote: Wed Apr 15, 2026 11:15 am As much as you'd like it to be, this game is not about you. It's a team effort to beat scum, so maybe try acting like a team player. I have faith in you.

Hjelp had a triggered role like me so caught my attention to see if I could use my details against theirs. No name as noted.annieh wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 11:50 pm Fireside, you said you were curious where hjelp was going night two. Why could it possibly matter to you as Cop Who Has Seen Some Things. Please also give role cop nickname if available.